Why Did The Stock Market Rise And Fall?

At present, equity market There are obvious "ups and downs". Why?

The way of culture and martial arts is "one relaxation". The way of stock market movement should be "one rise and one fall".

The stock market moves up, down and even because movement is absolute and static is relative. The movement of stock market is temporary. The rise and fall is a pair of contradictions in the stock market movement. There are two kinds of forces to rise and fall. Predicting the future of the stock market is also a contradiction. Bullish and bearish are interdependent and mutually exclusive. There is no bullish view without bullish. Similarly, without bullish, there will be no bearish. One side will not be able to exist without a party. Without contradiction, things will disappear and the world will develop because of contradictions. With conflicting views, a dialectical view of the divergence of the stock market will give you a new feeling and a new harvest.

Just think that only bullish, no bearish, everyone will buy stocks, who will sell stocks? Or only bearish, no bullish, everyone will sell shares, who will buy stocks? If there is no buy, no sale, no sales, how can trading be carried out, can the stock market continue to exist? At any time, there are bearish and bullish. This difference is natural and can never be the same, which is also determined by the law of stock market movement.

The difference between rising and falling is absolute. This is a contradiction. Law It does not depend on anyone's subjective will. It is absolutely impossible for anyone to imagine that everyone should see more, do more or watch empty or short.

We would like to think that in June 2005, when the market reached 1000 points, some people thought that the bottom was going to go up. Some people thought that it would go down. It would go down to 700 or 500 o'clock. In June 2001, when the market was 2200, some people thought that the top area would fall. Some people thought that the market would be 3000 and 5000. To do more and shorter transactions from time to time, there is a potential balance problem.

When analyzing the future of the stock market, insisting on the idea of "objective and divided into two", it is very normal to predict the disagreement. When people are looking at problems, objective problems tend to dominate subjective problems. This is for the full warehouse and empty warehouse. You may want to drop and the bearish factor will enlarge if you empty the warehouse. If you are full, you may want to go up, and the bullish factor will be magnified. Sometimes we will turn a blind eye to the opposite factors and go to the extreme. We can see only one thing, but not the others. This is rather one-sided and does not conform to the dialectical view of "dividing into two." In the prediction and analysis, we should not only see the influence factors of inflation, but also see the influence factors of the fall. We must weigh the bias and the possibility of going there to get a bigger probability of the rise and fall.

In forums and blogs, some people see their support with their own views, see that they do not agree, and others also accuse. Some uncivilized and self cultivation problems are revealed in language. These are self reflection and conceit. It is unscientific to regard their own views as criteria. If you can't see much, you have to see others too much. Does that make sense? If others are consistent with what they think, is it not the same brain? Is that possible? Is it right to agree with you? If there is no difference, there will be no contradiction, and there will be no such thing. That is to say, if you look at a problem, you will see it as "a peak on the side of the ridge, and a difference between the distance and the distance". The disagreement is normal. When the views are highly consistent, it just becomes abnormal. Of course, specific problems and specific treatment should be analyzed. The analysis of people's judgment is restricted by technology and experience. It is precisely because of their own ability problems that the analysis is not thorough and the judgment is inaccurate. There is nothing wrong with it. If it is an ulterior motive, it should be criticized and deceived in the heart to understand and falsehoods. It should be criticized and strongly condemned.

When you encounter different views of analysis, that is, the so-called "analysis". Ups and downs It is important to focus on the different reasons, expand our thinking space and expand our horizon of knowledge. We should have the idea of "choosing the good person and choosing it from the bad and abandoning it" to make our judgment more accurate and operate more correctly. To avoid looking at superficial and simple sentences, without fully understanding and analyzing people's thoughts and starting points, they blindly assert that they will lose a chance to learn.

Confucius said: "three people must have a teacher". People must have reverence, know the infinite understanding of things, the limitations of cognitive ability, understand the value of different views, learn to respect others' opinions, truly become a modest person, and you can grow quickly. Success is not far away from you.