• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    YOUNGOR'S Initiative To Sue For Injustice Is Not Infringement.

    2009/1/14 0:00:00 10249

    Youngor

    In July last year, YOUNGOR group was accused of violating the trademark rights of others.

    To this end, the YOUNGOR group initiated the judicial process, and demanded that it do not constitute infringement of the exclusive right of a registered trademark.

    Yesterday afternoon, the people's Court of Yinzhou District made a first instance judgment on the special lawsuit, and the plaintiff YOUNGOR group's petition was supported.

    It is understood that this is the first intellectual property related case since the court of Yinzhou obtained jurisdiction over some intellectual property cases last year.

    YOUNGOR was accused of infringing trademark rights. In March 20, 2008, YOUNGOR group received a warning letter from Wuhan citizen Li Moufa. According to Li, he registered the English "DP" trademark in August 21, 2003, and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, namely clothing, shoes, hats and so on.

    However, he found that the YOUNGOR group used the "DP" logo on some shirts and women's garments produced by him, which was the same as the registered trademark of "DP", which infringed on the legal right to exclusive use of registered trademarks.

    Lee asked YOUNGOR group to immediately stop using the "DP" logo and compensate for its losses.

    In April 8th, Li complained to the Yinzhou District business department and demanded that YOUNGOR group's infringement be investigated.

    In July 7th and 8th, the Beijing News and the first financial daily published articles respectively, saying that YOUNGOR group was suspected of violating Lee's exclusive right to use the registered trademark. Li has filed a lawsuit with the Chaoyang District people's Court of Beijing for compensation of 10 million yuan.

    After the two articles were reprinted through the Internet, they had a greater impact nationwide.

    But YOUNGOR group has not received the summons of Chaoyang Court, that is to say, the fact that Li sued YOUNGOR group does not exist.

    In July 24th last year, shortly after media coverage of the dispute, YOUNGOR group filed a lawsuit against the Yinzhou District people's court and sued Li, asking him to confirm that it did not constitute a violation of the exclusive right of a registered trademark.

    YOUNGOR group proposed that the "DP" marked on the shirt is the abbreviation of English Durable Press, which means that it is durable and ironed. Marking the letter is that the YOUNGOR group produced this kind of shirt with anti crease finishing technology.

    As a general abbreviation for fabric anti crease finishing technology in the clothing industry, "DP" has been widely recognized and widely used by the scientific research institutions and the clothing industry. According to the relevant laws, the use of the abbreviation in their shirts does not constitute infringement.

    In December 25th last year, the Yinzhou court held a public hearing on this particular intellectual property case.

    In the trial, the defendant Li still insisted that the YOUNGOR group infringed.

    Why did YOUNGOR not constitute infringement? The court's decision yesterday supported the plaintiff's YOUNGOR group's appeal. In the judgment, the court made a statement on the basis of the decision: "DP" is a general abbreviation for the fabric wrinkle finishing technology, which is widely used in the field of professional research of clothing. In the field of production, there are also enterprises using the abbreviation. Therefore, the plaintiff used the anti wrinkle finishing technology to mark the "DP" on the cotton ironing shirt to express the quality of the garment.

    The forty-ninth provision of the regulations on the implementation of the trademark law stipulates: "the general name, figure, model of the commodity contained in the registered trademark, or directly indicating the quality, main raw materials, functions, purposes, weight, quantity and other characteristics of the commodity, or the place name, shall not be prohibited by the Registrar's exclusive right holder."

    Therefore, although "DP" is a registered trademark of the defendant, because the "DP" is the general abbreviation for the finishing technology of clothing material, the plaintiff has the right to use it properly.

    What is the proper use?

    The court held that consideration should be made from three aspects, one of which is "to consider whether the purpose of user use is justified, that is, whether subjectively want to deliberately cause confusion between the public and other people's trademarks".

    The court is particularly interested in the identification of this point: the plaintiff's "YOUNGOR YOUNGOR" trademark is a well-known trademark in the top 500 brands of China, with a brand value of nearly ten billion yuan. Its shirts are also famous brand products in China, and the "DP cotton free ironing fine shirts" is a key new product of the state.

    In contrast, the defendant's "DP" trademark is relatively low in popularity, so the plaintiff can not deliberately let the public mistake their products for a relatively low reputation and no shirt Market Share (the defendant claims to only produce women's clothing) defendant products.

    Accordingly, the court concluded that the plaintiff's use was justified, and the plaintiff's request to confirm that the defendant's right to exclusive use of the registered trademark was not infringed was justified. The defendant argued that the reason for the plaintiff's infringement was not valid.

    The reason why the prosecution was founded is that the reporter noticed that one of the peculiarities of the case is that the plaintiff initiated the affirmation of the non infringement lawsuit, while in the general intellectual property case, the plaintiff mostly asked to confirm that the defendant constituted an infringement and was held responsible accordingly.

    So, is the lawsuit brought by YOUNGOR group in line with the law?

    YOUNGOR group's explanation is that the defendant Li Mou warned the plaintiff in a lawyer's letter, and disclosed to the media that he had sued the plaintiff. He expressed his opinion that the plaintiff had infringed his exclusive right to use the registered trademark and demanded compensation, which enabled the plaintiff to continue to use the "DP" logo in an uncertain state.

    To this end, the plaintiff initiated the judicial process to solve this dispute.

    This reason of YOUNGOR group has been approved by the court. The statement of the judgment is that the defendant asserted his right through legal means of complaint to the industrial and commercial administrative organs. However, after being sold by the industrial and commercial administrative organs, the defendant did not continue to initiate judicial proceedings to settle disputes.

    Due to the lack of support for judicial decisions with res judicata, the defendant insisted in the trial of the case that the plaintiff constituted an infringement, and whether the plaintiff could continue to use the "DP" logo is still in an uncertain state, so the plaintiff initiatively affirms that the non infringement litigation is in line with the conditions for prosecution.

    Yang Jing: editor in charge

    • Related reading

    XTEP'S Tail Tooth Feast Rewards Employees' Partners

    Enterprise information
    |
    2009/1/14 0:00:00
    10261

    Guangxi Yuchai Keeps Its Domestic Counterparts For The First Time In 8 Years.

    Enterprise information
    |
    2009/1/13 0:00:00
    10249

    Lining Appointed Former DELL High Level Zhong Yiqi As CFO.

    Enterprise information
    |
    2009/1/13 0:00:00
    10259

    Overseas State-Owned Enterprises Always Guard Against The Four Knives On Their Heads.

    Enterprise information
    |
    2009/1/13 0:00:00
    10237

    Wuzhong Garment Group Expands Space With Low Cost

    Enterprise information
    |
    2009/1/12 0:00:00
    10241
    Read the next article

    Zhejiang'S Foreign Trade Strategy To Deal With The Financial Crisis

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品一区二区久久不卡| 久热中文字幕在线精品免费| 国产一级一级片| 国产美女免费网站| 小受被多男摁住—灌浓精| 日韩有码第一页| 欧美黑人巨大videos极品视频| 舌头伸进去里面吃小豆豆| 视频一区精品自拍| chinese乱子伦xxxx国语对白| 久久综合九色综合欧美播| 亚洲精品字幕在线观看| 另类ts人妖精品影院| 国产叼嘿久久精品久久| 国产真实露脸乱子伦| 国产麻豆剧果冻传媒星空在线看| 性一交一乱一伦一| 成人爽爽激情在线观看| 成人毛片18女人毛片免费96| 日日插人人插天天插| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 欧美性高清极品猛交| 欧美成人鲁丝片在线观看| 欧美精品va在线观看| 欧美极品欧美日韩| 欧美日韩亚洲国产无线码| 母子俩肥水不流外人田| 浪荡欲乱之合集| 欧美特黄一免在线观看| 欧美性色黄大片www喷水| 欧美最猛黑人xxxx黑人| 欧美国产第一页| 欧美人与物VIDEOS另类| 权明星商标查询| 日韩精品国产一区| 日产精品一致六区搬运| 成全视频在线观看免费高清动漫视频下载 | 欧美同性videos视频| 欧美乱子伦xxxx| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区免费| 日本精品高清一区二区|