Us Electricity Supplier Tax Exemption Policy Will No Longer Exist?

With the advent of the Internet climax, the scale of online shopping users has been increasing, and it has increasingly become an important form of shopping.

The online shopping tax exemption policy has always been the focus of attention.

Xiaobian learned that since April 1st, Amazon has imposed sales taxes on four states such as Hawaii, Idaho, Maine and New Mexico. At present, Amazon has imposed sales taxes on 45 states.

Now let's take a look.

As we all know, Americans like to shop on the Internet most popular.

When it comes to Amazon, eBay and so on, Chinese sellers also like to use these two platforms, especially Amazon to sell products to Americans.

The reason why e-commerce is so prosperous that online shopping is so popular with consumers is that besides the convenience and convenience of shopping, price advantage is a major factor that can not be ignored.

The electricity supplier has a price advantage compared with the retailer of the physical store because the electricity supplier enjoys the tax exemption policy. Now, this price advantage will no longer exist. Here is the contribution of the two Cargo Alliance, Cheng Guiliang Mickey, to the US economic observation.

It is reported that since April 1st, Amazon has imposed sales taxes on four states such as Hawaii, Idaho, Maine and New Mexico. At present, Amazon has imposed sales taxes on 45 states.

In fact, Amazon has been taxed in 29 states and Washington, D.C. at the end of last year.

After entering 2017, Amazon has been expanding the number of states that need to levy sales tax.

These areas do not need to collect taxes.

At present, Delaware, Oregon, Montana and New Hampshire are the only states that have not been taxed.

In Alaska, though there is no state tax, Amazon will levy sales tax on different administrative districts.

No entity business, no tax collection?

Earlier, some States believed that Amazon did not receive a sales tax for this week's consumer Internet retailing, which affected taxes in the state. Amazon said that under the US law, Amazon had no entity business in some states, so there was no need to charge sales tax.

But now, Amazon has built warehouses and order execution centers in many states. The establishment of these entities has forced Amazon to start collecting sales tax gradually.

According to the memorandum of the conservative organization ConservativeAction Project (CAP), the Republican Party of the United States has reached a consensus with the Democratic Party that it will vote on the online sales tax legislative act "Marketplace Fairness Act".

According to the US political website TheHill, supporters of the legislation say that the bill will correct unfair advantages of the electricity supplier.

Because under this bill, the US government will have more rights to levy taxes on online shopping.

Let us review the legislative process of e-commerce in the United States.

According to the United States passed in October 1998.

Virtual commodities (such as software, music, etc.) should not be taxed, but the general commodities need to be taxed according to the entity's operating standards. Clothing brands, such as online retailing or retail retail businesses, are subject to the same tax, including 10% of the consumption tax paid by individuals.

The bill has been applied for 3 years, and has been postponed for three years.

However, according to the decision made by the high court of the United States, because the federal government and the state government can legislate to collect taxes, if a company entity is not in a state, if the consumer is engaged in pactions through mail or online ordering, the State shall not impose a consumption tax on the company.

Obviously, the US government has formulated the preferential tax policy for e-commerce, which is represented by the Internet tax Freedom Act, which is aimed at promoting the rapid development of China's e-commerce and maintaining the dominant position of the United States in the emerging e-commerce world, thereby promoting economic development and increasing government revenue at the end.

However, by the year 2013, the e-commerce market in the United States has gradually entered a mature stage.

Yes

It is unfair for traditional retailers to have unfair cost advantages.

Therefore, some organizations in the United States, as well as retailers in physical stores, call for a higher sales tax on electricity suppliers.

Of course, when such a call came out, it was opposed by the Conservatives and Amazon.

But it is obvious that the trend of levying sales tax on electricity suppliers is irreversible.

Later, Amazon and other big electricity providers gradually changed their attitude, instead of supporting sales tax on electricity suppliers.

Then, at the end of 2014, the US Senate passed the "market fairness act" in a vote on whether to allow states to impose online sales tax on online stores, with a vote of 69 votes and 27 votes.

The bill empowers relevant States to levy taxes on sellers who sell annually across the United States (cross state sales of goods or services) with a total revenue of more than $1 million.

In other words, if the bill is passed by the house of Representatives and signed by the president as a law, then the online shopping tax exemption policy will become a history in the United States.

More information, in the world clothing shoes and hats net.