Nanjing Office Of Industry And Commerce Was Stolen, Security Alarm Was Dismissed.

17, for this matter, Nanjing City Pukou District Propaganda Department responded that Pukou Industrial and Commercial Bureau The office of the director was stolen, but the property company did dismiss the security personnel, but the stolen product was a laptop computer and a camera. Pukou District Propaganda Department staff introduction, the case occurred in October 10th of this year, the police received an investigation after the police, the thief has been arrested. After the case, the property company dismissed security personnel. Online micro-blog broke the news that it was the daughter who was dismissed from security. After monitoring micro-blog, Pukou District Commission for Discipline Inspection quickly intervened in the investigation.

The theft of the director's office can not be regarded as a private affair, because the place where it occurs is public sector rather than private residence. Therefore, the matter should be reported, rather than on the wishes of the Secretary and his department. It is not improper for the security guard to report the alarm at the first time after theft.

But after the security incident, the truth of the incident was covered with "haze". The property company not only dismissed security guards, but also told the security chief not to go to the police station to make transcripts. Although the dismissal of security is indeed a matter of "internal affairs" of the property company, at the critical moment, the security guard's resignation for no reason at all is a daydream. One month after the incident, the daughter of the security guard said that it was easy to see that security and their families were obviously confused or emotional about being dismissed. This adds to the imagination of events.

Whether there is a legendary famous liquor in the office of the director can not rely solely on the words of one side. The response of the local public security department should not be absent. What is worth noting is that although the security guard has not seen the list of stolen goods, the so-called famous liquor is only "heard". But in a relatively closed environment, how can such a statement be circulated? Is it really "groundless"?

There are still two questions to be solved in this matter: the security guard said that he was dismissed, and what is the secret? Since the case has been detected, why did the local police refuse to disclose any details? When contacted by the local propaganda department, it was said that "the propaganda report on this incident is based on the statement provided by the Propaganda Department", which makes people even more suspicious. Why is it that the police "inconveniently disclose any details" must be based on the Propaganda Department's statement?

A case that was not complicated was confused by various abnormal phenomena afterwards. The involvement of the local authorities not only failed to make the truth "bright and beautiful", but added new doubts, so that the incident has been substantially upgraded from the office of the director to the local authorities. Similar to the public sector in the face of public opinion crisis, put their own credibility into the lessons and many, local should draw lessons from it. The theft of the director's office or even the smoke and alcohol in the office of a secretary may be trivial, but it may trigger. credibility Loss can not be ignored.