A Number Of Famous Brand Children'S Shoes Companies In China

Recently, AQSIQ announced the results of random sampling of 4 kinds of children's articles, such as domestic children's cars, children's shoes, children's clothing and toys. Among the well-known brands of children's shoes, many well-known brands of children's shoes have been put on the quality blacklist.

Among them, Longcheng group small angel children's carts were disqualified from sampling, including 16 brands of children's shoes, including ShenNa and Nanjing Ming Lu, were disqualified from sampling, including 13 toy products including universal toys, which were unqualified, including 26 kinds of children's clothing products including Bai Di deer, red dragonfly and so on.

The sampling report shows that the experimental results of the dynamic endurance test for children's carts of WA11PQA6881 under the Longcheng group's baby products (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. are not up to standard; the products of Shanghai sneca children's products Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Ming Lu shoes industry Co., Ltd. are respectively 200 (mm), one half and 170 (mm) x 4 pairs (2) of children's leather shoes, the free formaldehyde exceeds the standard; the Hangzhou Huanyu Enterprise Co., Ltd. is made of 40cm large red PUUCCA toys, and the main components and contents of the material and safety warning are not qualified. Ningbo Dixie dress Co., Ltd. didi deer size 110/56 for children's long sleeved shirt fabric content is not qualified; Wenzhou Red Dragonfly children's products Co., Ltd. specifications are 150/72 and 140/64 men's long sleeved shirt, can decompose carcinogenic aromatic amine dyes.

The author contacted several well-known brand manufacturers yesterday. The history manager of Nanjing Ming Lu shoes industry told the author that the children's leather shoes produced by the company were not detected because they were detected by finished shoes when the relevant agencies were testing. Because of technological reasons, the free formaldehyde in many finished shoes and raw materials was not very consistent. As for the specific technical reasons, Shi manager said he did not understand.

Didiro, who did not want to reveal his name, responded that the disqualification of the brand clothing was caused by the printing error of the tag, which was originally made of 80% pure cotton, and the tag was printed in 100% pure cotton. Ms. Zhang, director of the Red Dragonfly terminal management department, said in an interview that the company had recalled all the products that were not in line with the standard men's shirts, and set up a special investigation team to investigate the matter.