Merchants Decided To Refuse To Replace The "Special Shoes".

2011/11/3 13:53:00 32

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

Ms. Li of Qihe County wishes to buy a pair of special shoes at a shoe store. After she came home, she found that the heel of her shoe was cracked.

The shoe store owner bought a special shoe for Ms. Lee, not replacing it for three bags.

In October 28th, Ms. Li bought a pair of special brands from a shoe store in the county commercial street for 110 yuan.

Gym shoes

The shoe number is not up to second days to replace the shoe store.

However, when Ms. Li returned home, she found that the heel of her sports shoes had cracked, so on the third day, Ms. Li came to the store again and asked for a change.

The owner of the shop bought a special shoe for Ms. Lee, and refused to replace it within the scope of three bags.

In October 30th, Ms. Li called the 12315 complaint telephone and asked the business department to help.

The investigation by law enforcement officials confirmed that the consumers' complaints were true, and then pointed out to the accused party the quality of the bargain goods.

The owner of the shoe shop continued to refuse to replace it on the grounds that the invoice was not repaired or replaced.

Law enforcement officers pointed out that such a violation of the "Elimination Act" is a private provision for King terms.

The boss agreed to return the goods without knowing the reason.

On the morning of 31, accompanied by business law enforcement officers, the owner of the shoe shop gave Ms. Lee a refund procedure.

Industrial and commercial law enforcement officials remind consumers that when buying special products, they must not be fooled by merchants' proprietary rules, and specials will enjoy the same as normal products.

Three packs

Rights and interests.