Chen Guoqiang: In The Short Term, There Is Still A Big Gap Between The Manufacturing Level Of Vietnam And India And China.

In recent years, with India, Vietnam and other countries

Whether from the earliest Britain or to the United States, and then to Japan, to Hongkong, the status of the world factories in these countries and regions is indeed in the process of continuous pfer, but each process has gone through a long time.

We can not simply see that some factors such as labor cost have been replaced, that China's status will be surpassed.

It can be said that until now, the connotation of China's world factory is still developing and upgrading.

Industrial pfer, first of all, is a very long time process, which must be seen.

Secondly, at the present stage, because of the great changes in the world economic integration and the industrial background, if China wants to establish the factory status of the labor world, it is much more difficult than that in Britain, America and Japan. However, a fact that can not be ignored is that all the other elements are in a free flowing state except for the pfer of labor force.

Third, because the historical conditions have changed.

Moreover, there is another point to remember: China's industrial pfer is both in the process of undertaking and in a rational layout.

Our shift is not a forced pfer, but a reasonable and positive behavior of Chinese enterprises. It not only sees the problem of labor force elements, but also sees some market problems.

Because some products are close to Southeast Asian and India markets.

But we should not neglect "

China is a big country, which has been an advantage for a long time.

But we should learn from Germany and Italy very well.

In the course of the whole financial crisis, Germany has been affected, but why can it be relatively stable in European and American countries? This has a very large relationship with its considerable share in a considerable period of time.

Germany's design is very sophisticated, its manufacturing is complete, and its channels are very smooth. So in a sense, especially as a big country, it is impossible to undertake only one link in the industrial chain. China should stabilize its manufacturing and actively move to the two sides.

In a short time, there will be a big gap between China and Vietnam in terms of manufacturing level and China.

Now manufacturing is no longer a simple process. It must be remembered that the concept of "made in" is not a concept of processing.

In the early days, "made in China" equals to "processing in China". Now, "made in China" has already included marketing, design and some high-end contents.

If they want to catch up with China, it may take a long time.

There is a problem of "advantage difference".

It is not simply a question of "who is caught up and who is being pferred". The core is to enhance our competitiveness.

We need to make two arrangements, one to adjust the layout of the domestic industry, and the other is to learn the global layout.

For example, we already have some enterprises going out, it can set up factories in Vietnam and Kampuchea, but we can also buy the brand in France and Italy, and build our own design and marketing center there.

China is a big country, which can stabilize our industry with our own market and domestic demand, and build our industrial chain on the global scale at the same time of enhancing our capability.

So I have always said that our industrial development should also have a "three step" strategy.

First of all, we should integrate ourselves into the world and enhance ourselves. Finally, we should establish the position of resource allocation.

You can do this analogy, first you have to take part in the sports meeting to compete; then you have to get good grades, get into the finals, and finally get the top three teams to become the first tier.

In the final analysis, our chain economy should be viewed from the perspective of global economy and market economy.