• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Adidas'S Two Infringement Charges Against Cage Were Dismissed By The Court.

    2017/6/28 10:25:00 183

    SkechAdidasDesign

     Cage

    Sports brand

    Cage

    and

    Adidas

    There is a final conclusion on the dispute between Shanzhai.

    According to the world clothing and shoe net, recently, the US federal court dismissed Adidas's two accusations against Cage. The former pointed out that the Cage MegaBlade series copied the concept of its Springblade "blade fighters" shoes, and put forward to prevent Cage from selling the moving shoes, but eventually lost the lawsuit.

    In fact, this is the second time that Skech was sent to court by Adidas. In September 2015, Adidas accused Cage of copying his classic representative, Stan Smith.

    In the first instance of last February, Adidas won the lawsuit. The second instance is expected to take place in April 2018.

     Cage

    Bilateral

    Design

    The concept is very similar.

    At present, the two second court offices began in July last year, and Adidas accused it of illegally copying the design concept of its own brand sports shoes.

    The German brand claims that Skech intentionally infringed two patents on Adidas's Springblade "blade warrior" series three years ago in its Mega Flex 2 and Mega Flex 3.0 two sports shoes.

    This unique running shoe has a knife edge at the bottom, which supposedly provides high performance support and resilience for runners.

    For the two patent disputes, the court finally rejected the claim filed by Adidas.

    Judge Michael Simon (Michael Simon) said, "Adidas provides evidence of irreparable losses, a lot of speculation, lack of convincing enough to prove that Mega Blade sports shoes have a serious impact on the Springblade series."

    After winning the battle, Cage, chairman of Michael Greenberg of the US company, said publicly: "a year ago, when Adidas obtained the patent, the Cage Mega Blade shoes had already started marketing."

    Therefore, the court also believes that Cage does not exist intentionally violating intellectual property rights.

    Skech, who won this year, was founded in 1992 in California, USA, and originally started with a single product of leather boots, and began to enter the fitness market in 2009.

    Because of its moderate price and comfortable clothing, its fitness shoes quickly became popular in the mainland and gradually became the popular footwear brand of American consumers.

    With the help of sports shoes, in the 2014 fiscal year, Cage's sales reached $24 billion, and the company's share price doubled.

    In 2015, Skech continued to show a "black horse" attitude. The sports shoes Market Report of NPD, a research firm, showed that Adidas was pushing Adidas and Under Armour to rank second in the US market share of 5%, second only to sports giant Nike.

    In addition, it is worth noting that in 2016, Skech's sales in the Chinese market increased by 89% over the same period last year, and the brand's Chinese business grew rapidly.

    In parallel with the growth of its performance, in recent years, Skech has been involved in many plagiarism lawsuits.

    In addition to disputes with Adidas, Cage was accused of Nike in January last year, claiming that he had violated Nike's up to 8 patents in the past two years.

    Another sports brand CONVERSE also accused Cage of having mass production, distribution or sale of Shanzhai CONVERSE Chuck Taylor classic sneakers in 2014.

    At present, Adidas's plagiarism accusation has been dismissed, and Cage has finally breathed a sigh of relief, but it still takes time for the brand to completely remove the name of "Shanzhai addiction".

    More interesting reports, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats net.

    • Related reading

    The Technical Specification For Application And Issuance Of Emission Permits For Leather Industry Is About To Be Released.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/5/14 14:46:00
    78

    How To Avoid The Risks Caused By The Brush Up Behavior Under The Network Environment

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/17 22:30:00
    157

    Many Fake Websites In China Are Prosecuted By Dior

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/13 10:56:00
    48

    Pollution Problem In Printing And Dyeing Industry Is Serious.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/30 10:05:00
    62

    Water Pollution Control Actions, Layers Of Printing, Printing And Dyeing Industry Take The Lead In Achieving Certified Emissions.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/27 10:51:00
    108
    Read the next article

    "Ya Meng Pie" Children'S Clothing: A Card To Design A Stand Out

    Huzhou Zhili Yangshi knitted garments Co., Ltd.'s "Ya Meng pie" children's clothing in the use of color is also very characteristic, playing the original concept of color, with pure color of their own......

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 老师小sao货水好多真紧h视频| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊岳| 免费无遮挡无码永久视频| 九九久久国产精品免费热6| www视频在线观看免费| 苍井苍空A免费井线在线观看| 欧美性猛交一区二区三区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁2021西西| 午夜免费一级片| 久久99精品国产99久久6男男| 里番本子库全彩acg亚洲| 最近中文字幕2018| 国产精品理论电影| 亚洲色欲久久久久综合网| 中文国产成人精品久久下载| 韩国电影禁止的爱善良的小子hd | 999国产高清在线精品| 波多野结衣看片| 女人扒下裤让男人桶到爽| 做a的视频免费| 三上悠亚日韩精品| 色欲综合久久中文字幕网| 日本黄页网站免费| 国产男女猛视频在线观看| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清| 99精品中文字幕| 理论片手机在线观看免费视频| 性欧美18~19sex高清播放| 国产hs免费高清在线观看| 久久国产精品无码HDAV| 91手机视频在线| 最近高清中文在线字幕在线观看| 国产香港明星裸体XXXX视频| 人人添人人妻人人爽夜欢视av | 最新国产在线拍揄自揄视频| 国产午夜亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品国产99久久无毒不卡| 久草视频免费在线观看| 日本免费色网站| 国产a级午夜毛片| a级毛片免费观看在线播放|