The Real Owners Of Listed Companies Have No Right To Speak.

Because there was no applause in the "first time" at the shareholders' meeting, and Miss Dong, GREE electric, was on the scene.

Whether it is a large stock holder with a stock market value of over 10 million, or a small investor who owns a small share of stocks, he has been counted down by it.

In fact, Miss Tung needs no anger at all.

Although applause is related to politeness, it is also the right of participating shareholders.

Moreover, shareholders did not applaud, but also with the shareholders' meeting to consider the motion.

The real owners of listed companies do not have the right to speak, while some insiders manipulate the listed companies. Behind all this, the company is essentially a listed company.

This is the root cause of all the above problems caused by imperfections and disorders.

Since August this year, GREE Electric has thrown out a plan to acquire assets and raise matching funds since its issuance of shares, which has been widely questioned by its investors.

It is obvious that a leading enterprise in the air conditioning industry needs to ask a question mark if it wants to "enter" in the automotive industry.

Previously, many home appliance companies including Chunlan air conditioners entered the automotive industry in the name of diversification, and basically ended in failure.

Moreover, the value of GREE's acquisition of Yin long shares is only about 6 billion yuan, but it will be bought at a price of 13 billion yuan, and whether it is worth the same price must be dealt with as a question mark.

The most fundamental thing is that after the acquisition of bank shares and the collection of matching funds, the shareholding ratio of shareholders will be diluted, and ultimately will affect.

Own rights and interests.

Further speaking, as a shareholder, it is obviously not as high as Miss Dong, who is the chairman of the board. Miss Tung values the long-term interests of the listed companies, while the shareholders pay more attention to the immediate interests. This is also the focus of the contradiction between the two sides.

Therefore, Miss Tung did not applause at the shareholders' meeting.

However, Miss Tung's remarks are questionable.

For example, Miss Dong said that GREE did not treat you wrongly! I can not say this too much.

Do you have a look at the listed companies which have given you dividends? I can not give you dividends in five years. What can you say to me? Dividends should be paid. In recent years, GREE Electric has become a big bonus. GREE has not been unfair to shareholders.

However, Miss Tung should be clear that without the initial support of investors, GREE electric may not be able to develop into today's scale and influence in the industry.

It should be said that the capital market and the majority of shareholders have nurtured GREE electric appliances, and GREE appliances return shareholders. It is also their obligation. After all, obtaining investment returns is also a great demand of investors.

On the other hand, because of her own share in the listed company, Miss Tung is also the winner of GREE Electric's high dividend payment.

Therefore, Miss Tung has the dual status of the chairman and shareholders of the listed company. It is the owner of the listed company, and in some sense is also a "migrant worker" who works for the vast majority of shareholders.

Well, Miss Tung's failure to share dividends among shareholders is also a bit out of line.

Therefore, some remarks made by Miss Tung are misplaced, and all the shareholders, including Miss Tung, are the real owners of GREE electric appliances. They are neither the board nor the management of the listed company.

Who is it?

The real owner? The problem is not "no silver three hundred and twenty here".

In the current Shanghai and Shenzhen stock market, many investors of listed companies should have this question.

This year, Vanke's shareholding battle intensified, and there was a discussion about who was the owner of the listed company.

Although Vanke Company can have today's management work led by Wang Shi, Vanke belongs to all shareholders, but it is an indisputable fact.

Vanke's fight for share ownership has nothing to do with feelings. It has nothing to do with management's previous achievements. It is only related to equity.

Whoever owns more shares should have the right to speak, which is also the market meaning of "capital majority decision".

Or a party holding more shares can not control the listed company, but a party with less equity can act recklessly.

In these listed companies, some "insiders" become the "owners" of listed companies, while the real owners can not enjoy the rights and interests they deserve.