Cadres' Early Retirement With Money Should Take Account Of Social Equity.

In some parts of Hunan, there are recently some "office leaders" or "township leaders" who are not old enough to report to the higher authorities. They are required to make voluntary withdrawal from leading posts or voluntary early retirement according to the policy of "50 years old (or more than 50 years old) above the civil servants who can retire to the second tier and enjoy higher treatment than those on the job."

Some cadres have to raise money early to give up their reasons.

Some of them revoked redundant workers because of the reform of their posts, some of them were "young men and women" for young cadres, others felt that officials were not easy, others were incompetent.

Although it can not be said that there is no reason, it obviously does not take into account the public feeling.

Now, influenced by the increasing aging and the huge vacancy of pension, it is not only for retirees.

The rise is too small to win prices, and the delay in retirement is a foregone conclusion. A large proportion of the people currently working will inevitably encounter delays.

At this time, some local cadres can not only "leave early" but also enjoy higher treatment, making it difficult for the public to not think.

Yes, at present, civil servants' retirement wages come from finance and have nothing to do with public pensions.

However, the increase in the salaries of some cadres after the "early retirement" will increase the financial burden and make the financial pressure facing the downward pressure on the economy more intense. Moreover, after the civil servants' "early retirement", the vacant posts need to be replenish, which will also increase the financial burden and make it harder for the tight financial to separate funds to support economic and social development and increase investment in improving people's livelihood.

This will undoubtedly affect the public's sense of acquisition.

Moreover, some cadres who are over 50 years of age and have worked for a full 20 years are at a time when their work experience is rich and their age is strong. It is also a waste of talent for them to "leave early".

"It violates the principle of employing cadres.

In addition, if the cadres "leave early" or start a part-time job in related enterprises, if their supervision is not effective, their settling power may also be realized.

In this way, some cadres will be abused by public funds if they raise money earlier.

It is not impossible for cadres to "leave early", but we need to take account of social equity.

According to the actual situation of cadres, the organizational departments should make reasonable arrangements for their "early retirement" or not. If the retained ones are retained, they should not allow the sages to be lonely, and the mediocre ones will benefit. In addition, the cadres who are "retiring early" should be effectively managed and supervised, so as to prevent them from taking the retirement wage while making use of settling power to seek personal gain.