Improving The Electricity Supplier Legislation Is The Fundamental Way To Solve The Problem.

Opening to the outside world has enabled China to catch up with the wave of Internet reform, and let China quickly narrow its gap with developed countries. The electricity supplier like Alibaba has also created many Chinese miracles.

The Alibaba has been on the freeway. In the future, it will continue to run on the highway. It is not only a business level problem, but also a legal issue.

The existence of fake commodities can help solve employment problems in a certain period of time, and create huge economic benefits. However, based on its devastating blow to innovation, in the long run, it will be extremely unfavorable to the Alibaba and the long-term development of the country.

European and American developed countries call for strengthening in the global scope.

To protect and urge more countries to sign the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). One of the important aspects of ACTA is to clarify and strengthen the legal obligations and responsibilities of Internet service providers including electricity providers.

Although China has not joined the ACTA, the trend of globalization of science and technology and the pressure of intellectual property protection exerted by European and American countries are more important for the internal demand of national development for innovation, so that we can not ignore the importance of anti selling behavior.

We urgently need to improve the laws and regulations against the electricity supplier, clarify the legal obligations and legal responsibilities of the electricity supplier, so as to make the road of Alibaba and other electricity suppliers more flat, so that the interests of consumers and trademark owners can be protected.

First, there is an urgent need to formulate specific provisions for the electricity supplier.

As mentioned before, whether the electricity supplier has obligations such as monitoring and controlling the selling behavior, there are no specific laws and regulations to regulate it. The rules and regulations of the General Administration of industry and commerce are lower, and the regulations are more abstract.

How the electricity supplier should act as a way of delineating certain reasonable boundaries for the obligations of the electricity supplier is an urgent problem to be solved in legislation.

Second, it is urgent to promote special legislation for electricity providers.

SAIC announces that the white paper is instructive.

This is not only a realistic situation, but also an objective objective under the current legislative conditions.

Therefore, we should continue to promote the specific legislation of electricity suppliers, stipulate the specific procedures of law enforcement, stipulate the boundary and legal responsibilities of the electricity suppliers, and the administrative law enforcement authorities have legal basis to solve the problem.

Double dissatisfaction with officials (consumers and infringers).

Third, consumer and infringed rights need specific rules.

Consumers and the infringed can seek relief from the civil field. However, due to the lack of evidence rules and standard of proof in specific fields, it is very difficult for consumers and the infringed to safeguard their rights. It is urgent for the electricity supplier to legislate to solve these specific problems, so as to indicate the right of consumers and the infringed.

The dispute between Alibaba and SAIC is actually a product of the background of the lack of electricity supplier legislation. The electricity supplier does not know where to go, and the SAIC lacks the basis for law enforcement. The difficulty of safeguarding the rights of consumers and the infringed is also very large.

Therefore, it is imminent to promote special legislation for electricity suppliers.

Disputes end in law.