Louis Weedon's Shoes Were Accused Of Plagiarizing The Accused.

In the fashion day, the problem of "plagiarism" will never stop. Louis Weedon, the most famous luxury brand in the world, is Louis Vuitton.

New York shoe manufacturer LVL XIII Brands, Inc. in June 30th to Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon went to court, said the latter 2014 spring and summer latest shoes, copied from LVL XIII.

LVL XIII Brands, Inc. founder Antonio Brown

New York Daily News Confidenti@l interview said that he was very angry with Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon, saying he respected the Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon brand very much, but because of the Louis plagiarism Louis Weedon's plagiarism tort, he was scolded instead as a terrorist.

Antonio Brown founded LVL XIII Brands and Inc. at the beginning of 2013 (2013 stores). According to court documents, the brand shoe has been accepted by celebrities such as Chris Brown, Jason Derulo and Tyson Tyson, and has been exposed in magazines and televisions.

Louis Weedon is suspected of plagiarism infringement is not the first time, in 2009 Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon was New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. to court, New Balance said Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon's sports shoes plagiarized from the symbol of 574.

Subsequently, the two sides reconciled, Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon no longer sold the product.

The news was first reported by fashion blog thefashionlaw in July 7th. It was reported that LVL XIII Brands, Inc. itself was also suspected of plagiarism. LVL XIII Brands, Inc. accused Louis Vuitton Louis Weedon of the shoe Logo Metal before it was actually used in designer shoes, but it was registered as a trademark in March 2013.

The news became a topic again after being reported by famous media websites such as New York Daily News and IBTimes.

In addition to accusing Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, its parent company LVMH Mo t t Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA (Vuitton) MOET & CHANDON Hennessy LV group and its subsidiaries, the company is prosecuted for trademark infringement.

The case is accepted by New York Southern District Court, and the case number is 1:2014cv04869..