Alibaba Went To The United States Suspected Of Being "Noisy" And Putting Pressure On Hkex

< p > listing, delisting, re listing, Hong Kong stock, NYSE, < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > Alibaba < /a > is on the road of listing.

The Alibaba announced its bid to bid farewell to Hongkong and launch its listing in the United States.

< /p >

< p > < strong > only micro-blog is not bulletin < /strong > < /p >.

< p > yesterday, the Japanese newspaper reporter noticed that the disclosure that should belong to major information was only issued on micro-blog, and it was not released in the form of formal announcement; it was inscribed on "Alibaba group" instead of the usual "Alibaba group board".

< /p >

< p > has the application document been submitted? Will it be listed on the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ in the future? What businesses will be put into the listed asset package? Is it possible to go back to Hongkong again? Micro-blog is not clear.

< /p >

Less than P, what is intriguing is that "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp "Ali" /a claims that the press release is not (should not be regarded as) an invitation to issue securities in the United States.

Yesterday, this reporter asked a Alibaba public relations officer, the other side said that everything was based on the announcement, and no further information could be disclosed.

< /p >

< p > "according to the disclosure of micro-blog of Alibaba, it only started the listing in the United States, which means that it is only in the research stage, or even not submitted to the board of directors to discuss. It is not determined to be listed in the United States". A senior securities official in Wuhan believes that if it is to be listed in the US, that means it has been negotiated with the US side. It should be a formal announcement and issued in the name of the board of directors, because the board of directors should bear the responsibility of information disclosure.

< /p >

< p > < strong > or "forced" (/strong > < /p >).

< p > suspicious, many people believe that Ali announces that "launching the listing in the United States" is likely to be a "fight to the west". The purpose is to "force the palace" to put pressure on the Hongkong Securities Regulatory Commission and the Hong Kong stock exchange.

< /p >

After the delisting of the HKEx in June 2012 P, the Alibaba closed the market from the Hongkong stock exchange and concluded its 5 year listing tour. Now Alibaba hopes to return to Hong Kong stock as planned, but does not accept the partnership system.

< /p >

< p > "when Alibaba wanted to withdraw from the market and then" a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp > Listing < /a >, it was actually a means of playing with capital."

Some investors questioned online.

< /p >

< p > this delisting has left a bad impression on many small and medium investors in Hongkong. Investors have not received any returns in the past 5 years except for their meager dividends.

In the same period, Tencent brought about 10 times returns to shareholders.

< /p >

< p > surrendered Softbank, pushed YAHOO away, and took the lead in the world to peel Alipay. Alibaba seeks to solve the company's control by "innovative" dual ownership structure, but was rejected by Hongkong.

< /p >

< p > the Hongkong listing rule prohibits the double tier stock structure which gives more voting rights to a small number of shareholders, which is contrary to the principle of the Hongkong stock market regulator, that is, any company structure must treat all shareholders fairly.

< /p >

< p > industry analysis, if Alibaba chooses to be listed on the NYSE, although the listing standard is stricter and the listing threshold is relatively high, the control right may be guaranteed.

< /p >

< p > < strong > landing four stocks of the US stock > /strong > /p >

< p > industry investment experts predict that even if the listing in the US is successful, Ali still faces many risks: < /p >

< p > first, although the entry threshold of the US trading market is low, the threshold of information disclosure is very high, which requires the company to be more pparent.

Before the listing of Alibaba, China's e-commerce site Mcglaughlin and Lanting Pavilion have encountered litigation crisis.

< /p >

< p >, secondly, < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > Taobao < /a > fake problem.

In 2011, Taobao was listed by the US trade representative office as a notorious list of counterfeit and pirated products, which directly affected the Alibaba's credit in the United States.

< /p >

< p > Third, the greater impact on the credit issue is the Alipay incident.

Ma Yun pulled Alipay from the Alibaba group, triggering a series of investor lawsuits.

< /p >

< p > 4, big data problem.

At present, Alibaba's multi a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > electricity supplier < /a > platform has actually monopolized most of the market of domestic online pactions, and the large paction data and data disclosure derived from it may lead to domestic management.

< /p >