Who Needs To Reflect On The Angry "Twelve If"?

For a long time, I never had the urge to go to the new post again.

Thinking carefully, there are three reasons.

First, I do not want to write articles that are not painful, but the two is that the articles which are painful and itching are bound to be written.

Three, I feel that it is too late to say anything.

Whether this trend is good or bad, when the trend is formed, we have to wait for the cyclical inflection point to appear.

In addition to the common people, who can endure suffering?

If the changing club is a pioneer of sexual liberation, I would rather believe that the dogs in the street are the pioneers of sexual liberation, because dogs can be naked and surrounded by people, very self, free and independent, and will not care about other people's onlookers.

The reason why I don't want to be simple is simply not easy, because it is the choice of dogs.

If the price increase is a pain that must be borne in the process of development, I would rather spend three cents to buy an egg.

The price has increased for 30 years. I am afraid of this pain, and I will deduce the long pain of changing a sack of paper money to replace half sack rice.

Perhaps, ah, decades later, my son could carry a sack of paper money for rice, but at that time I was too old to move back, even if my son could carry a sack.

He will also be old.

I don't think my son can live one hundred years old.

Most people in China rarely live to be one hundred years old.

If the rich can drive the poor to become rich, I would rather believe that wealth perpetual motion is no longer a myth.

Because without the poor, we can never get rich first.

The first wealth is built on the basis of the poor. This is the conservation theorem of wealth.

Just like the perpetual motion machine can only be a myth, which is determined by the energy conservation theorem.

If

I can believe that the coffin shop owner does not want to die.

Because the accumulation of capital stems from squeezing.

If squeezing is moral, I prefer to believe that the slave owners are the pioneers of morality.

From slave owners to capitalists, the object of the squeeze is from slaves to workers, and the means of squeezing them from land to factories, just like the squeezing of stock market by financial market, means are different, and the essence is the same.

Perhaps the "donation" after squeezing seems moral, but the process of squeezing is far away from morality.

If a lie can be repeated one thousand times to become a truth, I would rather believe that truth is a lie.

If capitalists can represent poor people, I would rather think of capitalists as walls.

If private ownership is more progressive than public ownership, I would rather believe that slave owners are the ultimate forerunners of social development.

If the United States is the direction of the development of human civilization, I would rather believe that pirates are the pioneers of blue civilization.

If keeping a low profile is a long-term diplomatic strategy, I would rather believe that Ci Xi is a thorough diplomatic pioneer.

If black and white is socialism, I would rather believe that the underworld is the pioneer of socialism.

If...

To be honest, as a Chinese, I am only proud of having experienced the unprecedented Mao Zedong era. It is a unique and beautiful civilian era in human history.

Any lie and planting on that era can not change anything. What can be changed is that the author finally believes that a good society can make a ghost into a human being, a bad society, and make people a ghost.

If the one person one vote audition is regarded as a "right turn", the author will make a thorough "right turn" from today.

The reason why I turn right is simple: I can't bear more new friends to become old ghosts.

Who fulfil the purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly, I will cast a solemn vote on it.