The Market Of Radiation Protection Clothing Needs Different Scientific Voices.

The emergence of a new product has no authoritative standards at the beginning, and the standard is gradually formed with the expansion of the market. If too many advertisements cover up other voices, it is not conducive to the formation of scientific standards for new products.

Recently, CCTV exposed pregnant women. Radiation-proof clothes It will increase the radiation intensity inside the clothing, causing widespread concern among the public. Does pregnant radiation protection clothing have any effect? Is it harmful to human body?

CCTV reported that, according to a laboratory test, the current radiation protection clothing on the market can block most of the radiation, but it only resists the radiation in one direction. In real life, because of the large number of radiation sources, radiation will come from all the cracks in the bottom and cuffs of the clothes, but it can not be reflected out. The radiation in some parts of the radiation clothing will become larger. That is to say, wearing radiation proof clothing is worse than not wearing it.

After CCTV broadcast this report, radiation protection clothing Operator Immediately come out to question and clarify. They questioned the authority of the lab commissioned by CCTV and questioned the motives of those who put forward this proposition. Their biggest killer is that the CCTV experiment is not rigorous and loopholes, and the direction of electromagnetic wave emission in experiment does not exist in daily life. Moreover, if radiation protection clothing does not work against radiation or even aggravate radiation, then how can some scientists and technicians wear radiation proof clothing for radiation protection?

Later, someone was digging behind the CCTV TV show's backstage driver, and broke the other neutral expression of the Engineer in the program. However, people are questioning the radiation protection clothing market that manufacturers love 500 million yuan. shrink 。 It was reported yesterday that Zheng Junqi, Secretary General of the national radio interference Standardization Technical Committee, said that the radiation protective clothing worn by pregnant women is useless and useless when they resist electromagnetic radiation. For a time, the scientific problems of radiation protection clothing were confused and inconsistent.

Since the CCTV report, more than half of the people have abandoned the purchase of radiation protection clothing. According to the chief operating officer of the brand "excellent plus" of the radiation protection clothing brand, under the impact of CCTV's report on radiation protection clothing, "the freezing period of three months' industry can not be avoided".

No matter what purpose the CCTV reporter and the radiation protection clothing company have behind the scenes or no purpose at all, it is just hard to get rid of numerous "quasi mothers". Who doesn't want to protect their unborn baby? Where is there no radiation now? In order to prevent radiation, do we need to wear radiation proof clothing? No radiation protection measures, how can it be reassuring? So some people called for the introduction of an authoritative national standard for radiation protection clothing.

However, this standard is not good. First, what standard is it? Is it an industry standard for radiation protection clothing manufacturers, or a radiation protection standard for maternal and child health care, or is it a technical standard for electromagnetic radiation? Secondly, is the standard setting determined according to the static standard experiment done by the lab commissioned by CCTV, or is it determined according to the actual life of the manufacturer?

Although modern science can grasp the precise radiation detection technology, and understand the maximum radiation dose that the human body, especially pregnant women can accept, it is not a simple matter to formulate a standard of radiation protection clothing. It does not take time to determine these criteria. Even if we refer to the parameters listed above, and confirm the parameters we still do not understand very well, we must be able to identify them at a time.

If we hurry to set the standard of authority, not only is it not necessarily scientific, but also more likely to be driven by interest.

The emergence of a new product is not authoritative at the very beginning, and the standard is gradually formed with the expansion of the market. It is normal and inevitable for manufacturers to participate more. The problem is that too many advertisements often cover up other voices, especially some scientific voices. This is not conducive to the formation of scientific standards for new products. In the final analysis, it is also not conducive to the perfection of new products. Expand It is not conducive to the operators of new products.

This time, the conclusion that CCTV reports on wearing radiation protection clothing for pregnant women will increase the radiation intensity of clothing is comprehensive. It is not known yet, but at least it adds a bit of different voice to the overwhelming advertising of anti radiation clothing, so that consumers can distinguish it. Of course, for most consumers, they need a simple and clear answer. I believe that in time, the authority of the radiation protection clothing will be generated in the confrontation of various viewpoints.
?