Italy Luxury Brand D&G Further Provoked Controversy &Nbsp; Outside The Shop Prohibition Of Photography Was Blocked By The Public.

D&G, a famous shop in Italy, had previously banned citizens from taking pictures outside the shop, causing public dissatisfaction.

Yesterday, more than 1000 people responded to the online call to gather photos of the store in Guangdong Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, and asked the shops to apologize for the incident. The store was forced to close and suspend business.

D&G prevents people from taking pictures outside the shop. The law does not follow the principle of disagreement, which leads to their own bad reputation. They must learn lessons and change the style of the big bully.

However, for the improper practices of D&G, the public can complain and criticize through normal channels. It is not appropriate to put pressure on D&G by means of crowd containment. It not only hinders the normal operation of shops, but also creates a bad precedent, which will damage the business environment in Hong Kong.

The Italy brand D&G, which is located in Guangdong Road, "famous shop Street", was recently banned from photographing people from Hong Kong and journalists outside the store. It caused widespread concern. Some netizens called on Facebook to protest at D&G gate. In just a few days, tens of thousands of people responded.

D&G does not allow citizens to shoot. On the one hand, they may be worried about goods being infringed, for fear that someone will borrow pictures of plagiarism; on the other hand, those who have the ability to visit famous shops are mostly celebrities in cities, and those who are not rich are expensive.

However, for any reason, it is not the reason why D&G prohibits the public from taking pictures.

The area outside the shop belongs to the public place. D&G has no right to prohibit the public from taking pictures, and the arrogant attitude of its employees has aroused the public's disgust. It has finally led to yesterday's containment. It not only made D&G lose all day's turnover, but also damaged the goodwill in the event, which is difficult to estimate, and the lesson is quite profound.

However, the public thought that the D&G method was inappropriate and should have complained to the parties concerned and recovered justice through proper channels.

Nowadays, Internet users are pressing the D&G in the way of crowd control, which is not appropriate. It not only hinders the normal operation of the shops, but also sets a bad precedent.

Just imagine that if citizens feel unfairly treated or offended, they can incite others to encirclement shops. Is this way more overbearing than D&G? If we allow this atmosphere to spread in society, if we are treated impolitely, be cold shouldered by shop assistants, or even dissatisfied with the price quality of commodities, we will be able to encirclement the public at any time, and how the shops will continue to operate. The business environment in Hong Kong will also be hit hard.

In fact, Hong Kong's society advocates peace and reason, and tends to express its dissatisfaction through peaceful means. Expressing its demands in a fierce way will not get the approval of mainstream public opinion.

At the same time, the parties concerned should also pay close attention to the incident. If some of the citizens are still using violent means to hinder the normal operation of the shops, the parties concerned should also prevent their improper actions.