What Kind Of Soil Does Innovation Need?

It is no exaggeration to say that innovation will be the greatest asset of this era and the core of China's pformation from a major textile nation to a textile power.

The Internet industry represented by the United States has attracted worldwide attention in recent years.

Whether Facebook, Twitter or Youtube, it is called a revolution in the history of the Internet, which was eventually copied into Renren (formerly school network), Kaixin, micro-blog, Youku and so on, and even Groupon in the United States has been copied into a crazy group buying website in China.

From content to form, these websites almost copy the foreign models.

Although China has the largest number of Internet users in the world, making these replica products fast, copying can not be equated with innovation. Therefore, some people predict that in a long period of time, it is difficult for China to have world-class Internet Co.

Steve Jobs was compared with Shi Yuzhu of China, who thought that "two entrepreneurs who are equally talented and have similar personality backgrounds will eventually become successful sellers of junk products, while the other will become the most creative entrepreneurs in the world."

This person pointed out that to some extent, Jobs was lucky.

"In the United States, his idealism always finds suitable appreciers, so he can grind his teeth and not compromise with reality.

In China, we must admit that we are still a society lacking intellectual property protection, state monopoly resources and related distribution rights, and capital favors rights rather than knowledge.

In my opinion, the innovative thinking of domestic talents may lack the soil to grow from the beginning of school.

Although quality education has been advocated for many years, there is still a lack of exam oriented education.

In fact, schools should cultivate students' thinking process with independent personality rather than simply instilling knowledge. At the same time, the independent character and academic freedom of schools should be guaranteed.

Some authoritative professors in the industry pointed out that at present, many projects or subjects do not follow academic lead. Too many factors make the academic purity pure, which makes innovation lose its germinating soil.

Many people have great hopes for Shanghai New York University and Southern University of science and technology, and think they are new attempts to pform Chinese universities into modern universities.

In January 19th this year, New York University in Shanghai was officially approved by the Ministry of education, and was chosen to locate in Shanghai, Pudong and Lujiazui.

Southern University of science and technology is the national comprehensive reform pilot school for higher education, carrying the important task of exploring the mode of cultivating innovative talents in China.

Manufacturing is the foundation of all industries, but in the process of manufacturing power from China to manufacturing power, some phenomena are worrying.

Lang Xianping's "two dollar economy" theory has been recognized by many entrepreneurs.

The theory of "two yuan economy" points out that the current domestic infrastructure construction overbased on real estate is overheated, because resources are controlled in these areas; on the other hand, the manufacturing industry is too cold because its profit is thinner than that of razor blades.

In fact, the state has already realized the seriousness of the related problems, and the governments around the country are actively adjusting the way of development. For example, Guangdong province has indicated that the economic growth rate should be lowered to get the space and time for pformation.

And various tax system reforms have also become the focus of the manufacturing industry, because only when enterprises have surplus profits can they pay for innovation costs.

In a report on East Asian economic development, the world bank pointed out that when an economy reached GDP per capita of 3000~10000 US dollars, its existing development strategy was hindered. The problems left by the rapid development in the past began to appear, and it was called the "middle-income trap".

China has gradually entered this stage. How to jump out of the "middle-income trap" is the best way to achieve pformation and upgrading through innovation and development.

"The four Asian dragons" are the few representatives who succeeded in jumping out of the "middle-income trap".

Take Taiwan as an example, when the traditional manufacturing industry is losing its momentum of development, an innovative thinking "foundry" has subverted the existing mode of the industrial chain.

This kind of "foundry" is essentially different from pure production and processing, including the supporting integration of all aspects of the industrial chain besides top level design.

According to Lang Xianping analysis, at that time, Taiwan was well funded with a large number of "problem-solving" ability but lack of creativity of college students.

Combined with these characteristics, Intel and other international companies are responsible for the top-level design. Taiwan foundry has designed a wafer fab, and gradually formed a perfect industrial chain. Taiwan's well-known business groups such as TSMC, Riyue, Acer and so on were born.

Most importantly, during the period from 1998 to 2003, the economy of Taiwan was almost stagnant, but the number of patents continued to grow, indicating that it continued to possess innovative and high-tech quality.

The revelation of this case to industry or enterprise is that if we can not become a top-level designer and lead the development of the world industry, at least at the end of the industrial "smile curve", we will work at least through pragmatic pformation, which is still next to top-level design but still innovative.

I remember Li Kaifu, chairman and chief executive of Innovation workshop, and President of Google, former China, once said that innovation in twenty-first Century is essentially different from the past. It is no longer confined to the innovation of scientists, its application is stronger and its innovation cycle is shorter.

Invention + application = value, this is the core of innovation in twenty-first Century, and the paradigm shift comprehensive innovation may be more obvious today.

For example, Ipod itself is not a huge innovation in science, but it also brings huge repercussions to the integration of the convenient user interface, the interaction between computers and small mobile devices.

Therefore, on the basis of grasping the trend of the industry, it is also a development direction to further deepen the details.