John&Nbsp; Galliano Class &Nbsp; Is There A Black Curtain?

　　 John Galliano Because the anti Semitic speech was revival by himself. Christian Dior Removing the name, and then losing its own brand, has become the most severely disciplining designer in fashion history. At the same time, this is also an unprecedented social public event in fashion history. Its influence has already exceeded the fashion industry. It is not only concerned by practitioners, fans and beauty lovers, but also leads to extensive social discussions.

In the past, there were many designers who were fired by Dior company. Among them, there were Yves Saint Laurent and Gianfranco Ferre, who had the reputation and status of no less than Galliano. Why is it that only this time, the departure of the designers triggered a tsunami of public opinion, so that the "idle people" besides the designer's family and friends group could also quarrel with each other. Modern society's evolution of information communication channels and ways is one of the important reasons, but what plays a crucial role is the change of the designer's social status.

At the end of the twentieth Century, fashion was no longer just a simple aesthetic. It first became an attitude and a spirit of loving itself. This idea catered to the psychological needs of modern people to the greatest extent, and even no other commodity audience could cover such a broad spiritual level. In order to publicize this spirit, the brand needs its own spokesperson -- the icy models and the celebrity endorsement stars with huge changes in advertisements are not the best choice. In the eyes of more discerning consumers, designers who have moved together with the brand have the right to speak (though the final sale is not their design).

"Designers are the new opinion leaders" may be premature to say this, but it is undeniable that designers have already been a former stage performer by the tailor of the brand behind the scenes, and are responsible for guiding consumers to the most direct impression of the brand.

Therefore, the John Galliano was dismissed, even though Anti Semitism It is the absolute forbidden zone in western society. There is always a conspiracy theory in the industry. In fact, John Galliano, which is unruly in nature, has had racial discrimination and outflow. Drunkenness and foul mouthing have become a common occurrence. But this time, it has become a fuse for a series of disasters. The real reason is that Dior has already had enough of the designer who has been burning money without restraint and recklessly, and has no breakthrough in her image. It is true that Galliano can give everyone the admiration of the magnificent show on the annual Dior show. It is also a personal look at the curtain call with the model than the Sao show. But compared with the other brands of the same class brand, who are keen on various kinds of eyeball hype or topic marketing, it is absolutely impossible. Besides the occasional negative news, there is little organic time to occupy the tabloid headlines. Looking back at Galliano's fellow Chinese, Louis Vuitton's Marc Jacobs and her partner's sub division and love affair continue to play the cross border reversion of innocence and rebellious play to high; Chanel's Karl Lagerfeld step into the photography world, and the little boys are changed one by one; Prada's all day with the art circle eyebrow, looks like a low-key, actually it's a scug break through; even the former Lagerfeld's comeback is coming back, while playing the erotic stick while playing the mystery. If the opponent is so fierce, if Dior looks in his eyes, he will be very understanding.

Of course, the outside world can only guess about everything about Galliano. After all, the reason for Dior's dismissal is very clear: racial discrimination. In contrast, another case of designer dismissal recently shows that in today's fashion industry, design itself is no longer the only trump card in the designer's hands.