Home >

Shanghai Leather Shoes Comparative Test: The Coincidence Rate Is Only 55.17%.

2010/8/14 11:53:00 38

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee announced 29 items ranging from 239 yuan to 719 yuan.

leather shoes

The comparison test results do not meet the standards of 13 pieces, the coincidence rate is only 55.17%, and the problem shoes involve Kang Li, AI, Farali, Hasen and other brands.

This time, there are 10 suede leather shoes that do not accord with sensory indicators. For example, the sales of Kang Li brand leather shoes (model: 2L0011RDN) produced by the six hundred branch of Shanghai Xujiahui mall Limited by Share Ltd and Guangdong Nanhai dfeng Industrial Co., Ltd., its upper is obviously decolorizing, and after long wearing or washing, the color will be stained with socks and trouser legs.

The folding resistance is the index to check whether the shoe sole and the side of the shoe are easy to break. In this test, 1 leather shoes appear on the upper part of the shoe, which is produced by the nine sea Baisheng Plaza Co., Ltd. in Shanghai, and the AMEDA (love) brand leather shoes (model 93L45M48237) produced by the Yi Yi boutique shoe industry (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

The combination of heel and heel does not conform to the standard, which will cause the heel of the shoe to be separated from the upper and is easily injured during the wearing process.

There are 1 items that are not up to standard in this experiment, that is, Fala Li Sequin / sheepskin leather made by Shanghai Fala Li Shoes Co., Ltd.

Women's Shoes

(model: F21934), the measured value of the heel force of the right heel is only 400N, which does not meet the requirement of standard 500N.

Peel strength is the test.

Leather shoes products

An important index of adhesion strength between sole and sole, rubber shoes with low adhesive strength may produce glue when they are worn and stored.

2 of the tests did not meet the standards, such as the Hasen brand leather shoes made by Hasen Trading (China) Co., Ltd. (model: HS08701), and the measured values of peel strength of the bottom were not up to standard.

Consumer Protection Committee reminds consumers that the price should be considered when choosing leather shoes, but the price and quality of products are not necessarily proportional.

In this experiment, 6 samples of leather shoes were below 300 yuan, of which 3 were not up to standard; 6 samples were over 550 yuan, of which 1 were not up to standard.

Therefore, we should not buy cheap and choose high priced shoes.